The United States government has asked a federal court to end a set of limits on asylum seekers, but with a short delay. The limits were put in place by the previous administration, and they have been widely criticized by immigration advocates and human rights groups.
The limits, known as the “Title 42” order, were implemented in March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. They have been used to rapidly expel migrants, including asylum seekers, without allowing them to make their case for protection. The government has argued that the limits were necessary to protect public health, but critics have argued that they are a violation of the rights of asylum seekers.
In the court filing, the government asked for a delay of 60 days, to allow for a “phased and orderly” end to the limits. The government said that it would use the time to develop new procedures for processing asylum seekers and to provide additional resources to the immigration agencies that are responsible for handling asylum claims.
The court filing also stated that the government will work with the Central American countries to improve the conditions and security of the countries, so that asylum seekers can return safely.
The government’s decision to end the Title 42 limits is a significant step towards restoring the rights of asylum seekers. However, the proposed delay of 60 days is a cause of concern, as it gives the government ample time to put in place new restrictions. It is important that the government ensures that the new procedures they put in place are fair, efficient, and in line with the international laws on asylum.